libcom

Beitreten Weiterleiten

112 Mitglieder| 58 Shouts

Moderator: rknrkn
Gruppenstatus: Offen
Gegründet am: 12. Feb. 2007
Beschreibung:
Find out what all your favourite libertarian communists are listening to on the libcom last.fm group! But feel free to join even if you don't post on libcom....

A group for libertarian communists everywhere - If I can't listen to mp3's on my computer, its not my revolution.

Aktuelle Blogeinträge

Alle anzeigen

Top-Künstler der letzten Woche

Verknüpfte Künstler

Shoutbox

Sage etwas. Melde dich bei Last.fm an oder registriere ein neues Benutzerkonto (es kostet nichts).
  • Harliquensfly schrieb:
    September 2011
    So what are you guys marxists or kroptkinites?

    Harliquensfly einen Shout schreiben

  • fruehlingsorbit schrieb:
    April 2011
    *hums* Negras tormentas agitan los aires, nubes oscuras nos impiden ver...

    fruehlingsorbit einen Shout schreiben

  • inducedmadness schrieb:
    November 2010
    @adjustyourpenis: what not to do :)

    inducedmadness einen Shout schreiben

  • adjustyourpenis schrieb:
    September 2010
    what exactly does leninism have to contribute?

    adjustyourpenis einen Shout schreiben

  • fuckoffplebeian schrieb:
    Juli 2010
    Leninism does not 'suck'. While Leninism ultimately failed as an ideology in practice there are many lessons to be learned and many parts of it can and should still be applied in the struggle today. Fail, fail again, fail better.

    fuckoffplebeian einen Shout schreiben

  • Waagbistritz69 schrieb:
    April 2010
    AgeofGrunge> Are you ok? Leninism sucks

    Waagbistritz69 einen Shout schreiben

  • AgeofGrunge schrieb:
    Juli 2009
    ████████████████████████░░▒█████████████ ██████████████████████████░░░░██████████ ███████████████████████████▓░░░░████████ █████████████▒░░░░███████████░░░░░██████ ███████████▒░░░░░░░███████████░░░░░█████ ██████████▒░░░░░░██████████████░░░░░████ ████████▒░░░░░░░████████████████░░░░░███ ██████░░░░░░░░░░█████████████████░░░░▒██ █████░░░░░░░█▒░░▒████████████████▓░░░░░█ ███████░░░░████░░░▒███████████████░░░░░█ ████████▒███████▒░░░░█████████████░░░░░█ ██████████████████░░░▒▓███████████░░░░░█ ███████████████████▒░░░░██████████░░░░░▓ █████████████████████▓░░░▒███████▓░░░░░█ ██████████████████████▒░░░░▒█████░░░░░░█ ████████████████████████░░░░░███░░░░░░░█ ████████░░░██████████████▓░░░░▓▒░░░░░░██ ██████▒░░░░░░░░████████████░░░░░░░░░░░██ █████▓░░░██▒░░░░░░░░▒████░░░░░░░░░░░▓███ ███▒░░░███████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░████ █░░░░░███████████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▒██ ░░░░░████████████████░░░░░░░░████░░░░░░█ ░░░░███████████████████████████████▓░░░█

    AgeofGrunge einen Shout schreiben

  • gregass schrieb:
    Juni 2009
    Who like R.D.F, Subhumans, P.A.I.N, etc. I need more music along these veins.

    gregass einen Shout schreiben

  • fenixk19 schrieb:
    März 2009
    Hello, Comrades!

    fenixk19 einen Shout schreiben

  • skumbot schrieb:
    Februar 2009
    Libertarian Communism isn't about creating "libertarian communist" nations or countries, but the abolition of states as part of the process of creating a self-managed society. This isn't something to be held over the heads of people after the "withering away" of the state, but a real goal. Libertarian Communis, is another term for socialist anarchism. An "anti-capitalist state" is an oxymoron, as the modern state is both a prerequisite and necessity for the functioning of capitalism ( as can be seen currently ). Libertarian communists see state socialist regimes (such as Cuba, former USSR etc) as being forms of state capitalism, in which the fundamendal aspects of capitalism remain, with the state as universal employer. Wage labour, capital, money, property etc still exist, as does class struggle. Seriously, its much better to ask questions at libcom.org, this group is just a spin-off from that site. Forums here: http://libcom.org/forums

    skumbot einen Shout schreiben

  • moismyname schrieb:
    Februar 2009
    ...and the more it will depend on authoritarianism to deal with that. history shows that authoritarian states don't usually decrease authoritarianism on their own, and in the few cases that has happened, the opposition have always used their new freedom to take over. that's why i don't believe in revolution, i believe in reformism, and i believe that the only way to effectively beat capitalism is by using it's own main weapon: efficiency. take an average, liberal (in the european sense of the word), democratic western constitution, make a few slight adjustments to allow a legal status and financing system for worker-controlled enterprises and let them compete with traditional capitalist companies in a (fairly) free market. as long as a public financing system is guaranteed and efficient enough to get it's money back, the prospect of profit-sharing will draw the more motivated and diligent workers, leaving companies based on private capital to die out. that's how i see it, anyway.

    moismyname einen Shout schreiben

  • moismyname schrieb:
    Februar 2009
    if you establish a proclaimed anti-capitalist state, you will always have capitalist states denouncing, boycotting and sabotaging you, simply because they feel threatened. this is true for any anti-capitalist state, whether communist, libertarian socialist or whatever. a world-wide revolution sounds good, but revolutionaries world-wide can't even agree on the economic-political system that is be introduced, let alone get together to pull off a stunt like that. even if they could, at this time in history they would not have the support of the population, because people (especially those in economically powerful nations, which are the ones that count) are simply too compliant with what they know and too afraid of change. so they would have to use authoritarianism as a means to achieve their goals. once authoritarianism has established itself within a system, it is pretty much impossible to get it back out: the more authoritarian a system is, the more internal opposition it will have...

    moismyname einen Shout schreiben

  • tc-obo schrieb:
    Februar 2009
    Libertarian communism could not exist in a world where some nations are still capitalist - and neither could any other form of communism.

    tc-obo einen Shout schreiben

  • deepfriedbrain schrieb:
    Januar 2009
    http://www.last.fm/group/Prison+Abolition

    deepfriedbrain einen Shout schreiben

  • deepfriedbrain schrieb:
    Januar 2009
    ok but then riddle me this... how could libertarian communism exist in a multi-national context where some nations are capitalist? No nation, especially in this day and age is self sufficient, so how would a libertarian communist country open its borders for trade while maintaining a closed egalitarian society? It's what many economists argued was the fall of the Soviet Union... of course if a Communist revolution actually reaches its theoretical goal: the destruction of worldwide capitalism and the abolition of the wage system... then the need for a State, as we define it in modern contexts, is no more. Then perhaps you'd have what you call Libertarian Communism? Although Anarcho Communism or Syndicalism I think are better names for the red and black... @franko-gap: you're right, in the USA everything is politically backward (after all, the right wingers are "red" and labor day is in September!!) and I realize I misunderstood the use of "libertarian."

    deepfriedbrain einen Shout schreiben

  • franko-gap schrieb:
    Dezember 2008
    @ deepfriedbrain Listen, Marxist! :-p After the fall of Paris Commune in France were forbidden all kind of socialist, and especially anarchist organization. So the anarchist organizations started to name themselves in different ways - libertarian was one of them. So, in Europe and, for what I know, in most of the world, the word is more-less a synonym for anarchism. Libertarian (anarchist) communism is the ideal advocated by Kropotkin and many other revolutionaries till today. In USA, however, everything is upside-down and a political ignorance prevails: Obama a leftist? Come on, people! You can't be SO stupid... So in USA libertarian means something different than in the rest of the world... :-/ Any politically educated human will notice the cretinism of your cited Reagan: liberalism (the classic one, not the new economic market-liberalism) is the opposed of conservativism; and libertarianism is beyond liberalism, it is more radical, it is revolutionary.

    franko-gap einen Shout schreiben

  • franko-gap schrieb:
    Dezember 2008
    Fuk mp3s! I want Oggs! Free software in a free society. ;-)

    franko-gap einen Shout schreiben

  • skumbot schrieb:
    Dezember 2008
    Quoting Friedrich von Hayek. Epic fail. Heres a good start. http://www.infoshop.org/faq/secI1.html

    skumbot einen Shout schreiben

  • dyingdreams schrieb:
    Dezember 2008
    You guys have absolutely no idea of what you're talking about, at all. Anti-Socialism

    dyingdreams einen Shout schreiben

  • skumbot schrieb:
    September 2008
    Hiya. This is Django from the boards.

    skumbot einen Shout schreiben

Alle 58 Shouts anzeigen
libcoms Gruppenradio

Neueste Mitglieder (112)

Alle Mitglieder anzeigen

Letzte Aktivitäten

  • paddypunx ist dieser Gruppe beigetreten. vor 13 Tagen
  • butashadow ist dieser Gruppe beigetreten. vor 14 Tagen
  • Deconstruction hat diese Gruppe verlassen. November 2011
  • Deconstruction ist dieser Gruppe beigetreten. November 2011
  • yellowcarpet hat diese Gruppe verlassen. August 2011
  • colinrice hat diese Gruppe verlassen. Mai 2011
  • fruehlingsorbit hat diese Gruppe verlassen. Mai 2011
  • fruehlingsorbit ist dieser Gruppe beigetreten. April 2011
  • spassmaschine hat diese Gruppe verlassen. Januar 2011
  • Ein gelöschter Benutzer hat diese Gruppe verlassen. Dezember 2010