• [Gelöschter Benutzer] schrieb...
    • Benutzer
    • 21. Apr. 2008, 2:29
    now it works :




    hm, I don't understand why it's 24.1%

  • mine is 0. it was 121 or 125 last month.

    I'm assuming it's due to an error, but, I still win.

    here: set it to vibrate and finish yourself off.
  • versionfiv said:
    mine is 0. it was 121 or 125 last month.

    I'm assuming it's due to an error, but, I still win.


    hahaha.... weird.... :p

    mine is 103... o wellz...

    theycallmeruffi.com
    • [Gelöschter Benutzer] schrieb...
    • Benutzer
    • 22. Apr. 2008, 10:27
    I think mine was 138, and it's now 140, so no real problems for me...


    Now i've read this thread i want a low one, just so i can fit in. xD

    • B1axun schrieb...
    • Benutzer
    • 22. Apr. 2008, 14:09
    Lowtag said:

    hm, I don't understand why it's 24.1%


    maybe because it counted the ones without a tag... so that one artist with a tag makes up 24%?

    • fatalyti schrieb...
    • Benutzer
    • 2. Mai. 2008, 21:40
    sing, sing.
    • Juddu schrieb...
    • Benutzer
    • 10. Mai. 2008, 16:16
    Wolfsgesang has OMI 13...pretty well, I have 0, might be a error but still :D

    • MarsFunk schrieb...
    • Benutzer
    • 2. Jun. 2008, 11:34

    Finish..or not?

    http://www.lastfm.de/user/black-Sakura/

    It seems that 0 is the lowest OMI..
    Though it's caused by an error^^

    Someone here with a negative OMI? =D

  • The lowest "REAL" OMI I've seen is 12. It was some guy who listened to 4 bands total, all from the same genres.

    • Lietvyris schrieb...
    • Benutzer
    • 14. Jul. 2008, 17:59
    I have seen 7 :P Don't remember the name...

  • 39 or somethin' ?

    • [Gelöschter Benutzer] schrieb...
    • Benutzer
    • 23. Aug. 2008, 20:21
    24 from a guy that told me I was a narrow minded person (me having 92)

    • patysmen schrieb...
    • Benutzer
    • 30. Aug. 2008, 13:05
    • [Gelöschter Benutzer] schrieb...
    • Benutzer
    • 31. Aug. 2008, 7:15
    25 here :D






    Edit: Not anymore :P :P :P

    Bearbeitet von einem gelöschten Benutzer am 6. Okt. 2008, 17:15
    • dubhead schrieb...
    • Abonnent
    • 6. Okt. 2008, 15:08
    This chick has only 15! (and 27,000 plays)

    spin_me_round

    DUBmecrazy:():crazymeDUB
    • nicoelf schrieb...
    • Benutzer
    • 24. Okt. 2008, 12:18
    I had only 6 on my first OMI.

    • almo123 schrieb...
    • Benutzer
    • 26. Okt. 2008, 18:20
    http://www.last.fm/user/Xstatic-process has an OMI of 14, 65000 plays, only one artist: madonna.

    • [Gelöschter Benutzer] schrieb...
    • Benutzer
    • 2. Nov. 2008, 15:53
    Another 14 here...




    http://www.lastfm.de/user/fuko666

    Only one artist, and even worse than Madonna... :D

  • The problem with OMI is an instant bias depending on the amount of music you listen to (if you got 5 000 tracks scrobbled your OMI will most likely be less than if it was 50 000) as well as last.fm users in general not being able to scrobble certain artists and tracks properly, as well as the issue that last.fm merges artists with same names so what shows up at your OMI can in fact be something completely different.

Anonyme Benutzer dürfen keine Beiträge schreiben. Bitte log dich ein oder registriere dich, um Beiträge in den Foren schreiben zu können.